This will be a talk for the Philosophy of Mathematics Seminar at the University of Oxford, 19 May 2025.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ed4d/8ed4deb5c51e56820faf488c4c89ed669aed7b74" alt="How we might have viewed the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental axiom necessary for mathematics, Oxford Phil Maths seminar, May 2025 How we might have viewed the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental axiom necessary for mathematics, Oxford Phil Maths seminar, May 2025"
Abstract. I shall describe a simple historical thought experiment showing how our attitude toward the continuum hypothesis could easily have been very different than it is. If our mathematical history had been just a little different, I claim, if certain mathematical discoveries had been made in a slightly different order, then we would naturally view the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental axiom of set theory, necessary for mathematics and indeed indispensable for calculus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb4a7/fb4a7c5cf20aeb852ff34864a11e2fe43411762b" alt=""
I shall be speaking on my paper: How the continuum hypothesis could have been a fundamental axiom